Search by Model
Search by Class
About Us
|
Search by Model
|
Search by Class
|   Home
Home > Compact SUV
Find out which Compact SUV is No.1 in each category
Reviews
   Compact SUV ranked by  Reviews
Select cars to compareSelling PointGet a Free Quote
1
2005 Honda Element
“The innovation comes in the form of an auxiliary input jack that allows things like an Apple iPod or other MP3 player to seamlessly pump its tunes through the Element's seven speakers.” — The Car Connection   See More Reviews
4.8 
2
2005 Toyota RAV4
“...improved at every turn. It's bigger, faster, safer, smoother riding and better handling.” — New Car Test Drive   See More Reviews
4.7 
3
2005 Honda CR-V
“loaded with nifty features and...its all-around practicality and comfort deserve high marks.” — New Car Test Drive   See More Reviews
4.4 
3
TIE
2005 Mazda Tribute
“While the Tribute is smaller than the Explorer, you certainly don't feel cramped. Seats ride at just the right height for most drivers and passengers to get in and out with ease.” — AutoWeek   See More Reviews
4.4 
4
2005 Ford Escape
“I found the Escape's handling to be stable, predictable, and the driving experience to be enjoyable.” — Canadian Driver   See More Reviews
4.3 
5
2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
“Tight winding roads and wide-open highways prove the Outlander to be a very competent and comfortable handler.” — Edmunds.com   See More Reviews
3.8 
6
2005 Hyundai Tucson
“The cloth seats are comfortable and well cushioned for long-distance travel without having to pause to retune the vertebrae.” — Cars.com   See More Reviews
3.7 
6
TIE
2005 Kia Sportage
“The Sportage scores on the safety front by including standard four-wheel disc brakes, seat-mounted side-impact airbags for front occupants and front and rear head-protecting curtain airbags.” — Edmunds.com   See More Reviews
3.7 
7
2005 Jeep Wrangler
“It's the right choice for perilous off-road treks like California's Rubicon Trail. But it's also fun for cruising around the neighborhood.” — New Car Test Drive   See More Reviews
3.6 
7
TIE
2005 Mercury Mariner
“Two-tone suede and leather seating steals the show...and combined with contrasting stitching, the look is very handsome.” — Edmunds.com   See More Reviews
3.6 
7
TIE
2005 Subaru Forester
“According to the U.S. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) front crash tests, the Forester was the only SUV in its class to be rated 'Good'” — Canadian Driver   See More Reviews
3.6 
8
2005 Chevrolet Equinox
“Inside, Chevrolet designers opted for a simple, industrial look with large, clear gauges and faux aluminum accents.” — Edmunds.com   See More Reviews
3.5 
8
TIE
2005 Saturn VUE
“Vue's deficits in handling and overall refinement are nearly balanced by its outstanding V6 performance.” — Consumer Guide   See More Reviews
3.5 
9
2005 Suzuki XL-7
“By offering a third-row seat in a compact SUV, Suzuki answers a question not many people are asking.” — Edmunds.com   See More Reviews
3.2 
9
TIE
2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser
3.2 
9
TIE
2005 Jeep Liberty
3.2 
10
2005 Ford Explorer Sport Trac
“To create the Sport Trac, developers first stretched the Explorer?s frame by 15 inches. They also incorporated more aggressive styling, such as flared rear fenders, than the regular four-door Explorer exhibits.” — Cars.com   See More Reviews
2.9 
11
2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara
“The Grand Vitara can be quite cramped in terms of passenger and cargo space. In fact, the Grand Vitara has about six inches less rear legroom than most of its competitors.” — Edmunds.com   See More Reviews
2.1 
Select cars to compareCheck all 
Rank Compact SUV by:
Expert Reviews
MSRP
Invoice
0 to 60 Acceleration
MPG
Resale Value
Performance and Handling
Comfort and Convenience
Safety Features
Passenger Space
Cargo Capacity
Off Road Capability

Select other years
2024  2023  2022  2021  2020  2019  2018  2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998  1997  1996  1995  1994  1993  1992 

How are models ranked?

Autos.com editors have compiled the most extensive rating database on the internet, drawing upon $20 million of automotive research from CarsDirect and Autodata, and summarizing expert opinion from an extensive group of the leading third party sources. Here is a brief overview of how we do it:

Professional Reviews Ranking: Autos.com editors analyze car reviews from a range of magazines and websites, distill each down to a quantifiable ranking and then average those rankings to arrive at the Professional Review Rank.

Other Rankings: Autos.com also ranks vehicles based on criteria such as fuel efficiency, cargo capacity, and comfort and convenience features. You can see some of the data that we have used to rate each vehicle in any given category by expanding the category header on the vehicle detail page. For example, click on the arrow next to "Passenger Space" on the Honda Civic detail page to see the actual measurements for that vehicle's interior. These measurements were stacked up against the interior measurements of all the other vehicles in the compact car segment in order to calculate the Honda Civic's rating in the Passenger Space category. That rating is then used to determine the Honda Civic's overall ranking in the compact car category.


Search by Class
Passenger Car
Compact Car
Mid-Size Car
Sporty Car
Luxury Car
Near-Luxury Car
Mid-Luxury Car
Ultra-Luxury Car
Truck
Compact Truck
Full-Size Truck
SUV
Compact SUV
Mid-Size SUV
Full-Size SUV
Luxury SUV
Van
Minivan
Full-Size Van
Search by Make
Acura
Alfa Romeo
Aston Martin
Audi
Bentley
BMW
Buick
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Dodge
Ferrari
FIAT
Ford
Genesis
GMC
Honda
Hyundai
INFINITI
Jaguar
Jeep
Kia
Lamborghini
Land Rover
Lexus
Lincoln
Lotus
Lucid
Maserati
Mazda
McLaren
Mercedes-Benz
MINI
Mitsubishi
Nissan
Polestar
Porsche
RAM
Rivian
Rolls-Royce
Subaru
Tesla
Toyota
VinFast
Volkswagen
Volvo



 Autos.com  Affiliate Program  Site Map  Terms of Use  Privacy Policy    Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information  Cookie Policy  Disclaimer  Dealer Inquiries  How Models are Ranked  Tech Support

Copyright © 2004-2023 MH Sub I, LLC.